It's all fictional, just for fun, but the reasoning is real.
For example, if you rarely eat lobsters and attend a gathering where some people disdain wasting time eating and rush to socialize, it might seem impressive.
If you focus on eating alone, it may leave others with the impression that you lack experience and have never seen the world.
There’s a video of Cao Dewang where he eats during a break at a gathering, and the security or secretary nearby doesn’t let them disturb him while he eats.
Ren Zhengfei's daughter seems to share her mother's surname.
When chatting with friends about military matters or the global situation, if you’re not knowledgeable, even if you have a close relationship, they might say you really lack experience.
In your company's new project, if you can't handle it and your boss says you're the CTO now, how can you be so inexperienced? Of course, if he’s not intentionally making things difficult for you, he’s just joking. Haha.
Making money selling cabbage while worrying like you’re in Zhongnanhai. Is this experience? Is this prejudice?
Having read a lot of news, books, done many things, met many impressive people, traveled the world, and experienced various lives—does that mean you have experience?
Or is it just the literal meaning, recognizing what you see? What’s the difference from intelligent recognition functions? There is a difference; simultaneous interpretation is quite expensive by the hour, while other voice recognition services are cheaper.
Wukong's keen eyesight seems quite high, but it’s not very useful; many things can’t be recognized. Does it imply class? Is it difficult to cross or very hard to cross?
After Wukong achieves his goal, does his experience become fixed? Fighting monsters becomes a specific problem analysis and solution, knowing whom to seek help from, bringing in reinforcements—he indeed has a leadership style. Isn’t that what leaders do? No, everyone does that. Otherwise, the service industry wouldn’t be growing larger.
For Wukong, experience here means being able to prevent scams, high-level scams targeting lower-level people. However, the golden cicada is quite unfortunate, switching between high and low levels.
Speaking of lobsters, you recognize they are good, but some people pretend to recognize them and claim to eat them often, and it seems that because they eat them every day, they have developed high uric acid levels, leading to the feeling that they can’t eat them now. It gives off a sense of high status. You see them wearing a short-sleeved deep blue shirt that has faded to light blue, and you smile. Pretending to be very knowledgeable. You say, "Brother, you eat them often, huh? Uric acid levels exceeded?"
That guy stretches out his hand, trying to tug at his golden Bitcoin symbol ring, with swollen joints from gout, unable to take the ring off.
Reference
You Must Have Misunderstood These Concepts About Politics (Political Philosophy History, 3rd Edition) Review
Some interesting viewpoints.
Note
Hegel once said, "China has no history," because history should have its purpose, while China's history is essentially a dead cycle. According to the ancient Greeks, the Chinese have never engaged in politics. Politics should arise from persuasion, not conquest.
The meaning of politics should point to the legitimacy of authority; only those with swords are rogues and robbers. Military and politics are antonyms; military dictatorship is always a result of political failure, reverting to a state without politics, back to power struggles, violence, and direct suppression.
Human rule can be achieved in two ways: through military confrontation or verbal disputes. The ancient Greeks invented the concept of "politics," believing that politics is the art of language. Using "politics" to solve problems means persuasion, negotiation, voting, and reaching agreements, rather than military force, dictatorship, or violent conquest.
The ancient Greeks viewed politics as an honor, representing human civilization and the fundamental difference between humans and animals. Politics should reflect a consensus, a collective pursuit of freedom, fairness, and justice.
Many people believe that liberals are equivalent to atheists. Most theists have constraints, and few liberals hold the concept of "God exists." This view is mostly derived from superficial impressions of modern liberalism.
Many who now call themselves "liberals" have little understanding of the historical foundations of liberalism. Liberals are quite wary of government, viewing it as a necessary evil, with its powers limited to basic public affairs. In the minds of liberals, a qualified government should at least meet three criteria:
-
Power cannot be concentrated in one person's hands; there must be a precise system to prevent the unlimited expansion of power, known as the separation of powers. This vigilance against power is based on the Christian doctrine of original sin. The Bible states that there is no righteous person in this world; even the seemingly perfect person can hardly guarantee they won’t commit evil under the temptation of power, becoming a totalitarian dictator. Therefore, designing a system to prevent the monopolization of power is essential.
-
The government must fully respect human rights. The foundation of liberalism is human rights, believing that everyone has the right to life, property, and freedom, which are sacred and inviolable. This idea originates from the Christian cultural concept of "inalienable human rights," where God created humans in His image, making human life noble and inviolable—this is the foundation of human rights.
If one strips away Christian culture and discusses the concept of human rights independently, it becomes vague and unfounded, unable to explain why animals lack these basic rights. If we only follow the jungle law of evolution, survival of the fittest, then the weak should be eliminated; what necessity is there for the strong to uphold the basic rights of the weak?